Difference between revisions of "Dislocation Density Based Hardening"

From OSUPDOCS
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A dislocation density based polycrystal plasticity model [[Hardening Laws|hardening law]] (see Estrin et al.<ref name="Estrin">Estrin et al., "A dislocation-based model for all hardening stages in large strain deformation," ''Acta mater.'', '''46''', 5509-5522 (1998)</ref> and Toth et al.<ref name="Toth">Toth et al., "Strain hardening at large strains as predicted by dislocation based polycrystal plasticity model," ''J. Eng. Mat. and Techn.'', '''124''', 71-77 (2002)</ref>).
A dislocation density based polycrystal plasticity model [[Hardening Laws|hardening law]] (see Estrin et al.<ref name="Estrin">Estrin et al., "A dislocation-based model for all hardening stages in large strain deformation," ''Acta mater.'', '''46''', 5509-5522 (1998)</ref> and Toth et al.<ref name="Toth">Toth et al., "Strain hardening at large strains as predicted by dislocation based polycrystal plasticity model," ''J. Eng. Mat. and Techn.'', '''124''', 71-77 (2002)</ref>).


The model allows for the tracking of dislocation density and provides a response variable that describes the grain size (or dislocation cell size) based on the variation in dislocation density. It considers the cell or grain to be made of two phases; a cell wall and cell interior, each with its own dislocation density. These two distinct dislocation densities are the internal variables of the model.  
The model allows for the tracking of dislocation density and provides a response variable that describes the grain size (or dislocation cell size) based on the variation in dislocation density. It considers the cell or grain to be made of two phases; a cell wall and cell interior, each with its own dislocation density. These two distinct dislocation densities are the internal variables of the model.  
Line 7: Line 6:
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<math>\rho_{t} = f\rho_{w} + (1-f)\rho_{c}</math>
<math>\rho_{t} = f\rho_{w} + (1-f)\rho_{c}</math>


Where &rho;<sub>t</sub> is the total dislocation density, <math>f</math> is the volume fraction of the cell walls, &rho;<sub>c</sub> and &rho;<sub>w</sub> are the dislocation densities in the cell interior and cell walls respectively.  
Where &rho;<sub>t</sub> is the total dislocation density, <math>f</math> is the volume fraction of the cell walls, &rho;<sub>c</sub> and &rho;<sub>w</sub> are the dislocation densities in the cell interior and cell walls respectively.  
Line 17: Line 15:


Where d is the average cell size and K is a proportionality constant.
Where d is the average cell size and K is a proportionality constant.
The relation for volume fraction of the dislocation density in the cell walls, <math>f</math>, is associated with the shear strain rate, <math>\dot\gamma_r</math>, and the saturation value of <math>f</math> at large strains and initial volume fraction, <math>f_{\infty}</math> and <math>f_o</math> respectively, which are constants. <math>\tilde\gamma^{r}</math>, is the rate of variation of <math>f</math> with resolved shear strain rate, <math>\tilde{\gamma}</math>.
The relation for volume fraction of the dislocation density in the cell walls, <math>f</math>, is associated with the resolved shear strain rate, <math>\gamma^r</math>, and the saturation value of <math>f</math> at large strains and initial volume fraction, <math>f_{\infty}</math> and <math>f_o</math> respectively, which are constants. <math>\tilde\gamma^{r}</math>, is the rate of variation of <math>f</math> with resolved shear strain rate, <math>\gamma^r</math>.


&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Line 39: Line 37:
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<math>\tau^{r} = f \tau^{r}_{w} + (1-f) \tau^{r}_{c}</math>
<math>\tau^{r} = f \tau^{r}_{w} + (1-f) \tau^{r}_{c}</math>
Where <math>\tau^{r}</math> is the resolved shear stress in the material. The yield stress, <math>\sigma_y</math> is proportional to this term via the Taylor Factor, M.
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<math>\sigma_y = M \tau^{r}</math>


The evolution equations for the dislocation density in the cell interior and cell wall are given below. Their evolution rate is a function of addition, subtraction and annihilation of dislocations. The growth of both can be attributed to Frank-Read sources at the cell wall or interior interface. The loss of cell interior dislocations can also be attributed to the movement from cell interior into the cell wall. The annihilation of cell dislocations is governed by cross-slip, whereby positive and negative dislocations, or “out of phase” dislocations cancel each other out, this is the last term in each equation.
The evolution equations for the dislocation density in the cell interior and cell wall are given below. Their evolution rate is a function of addition, subtraction and annihilation of dislocations. The growth of both can be attributed to Frank-Read sources at the cell wall or interior interface. The loss of cell interior dislocations can also be attributed to the movement from cell interior into the cell wall. The annihilation of cell dislocations is governed by cross-slip, whereby positive and negative dislocations, or “out of phase” dislocations cancel each other out, this is the last term in each equation.
Line 65: Line 68:
The strength of this physically-based microstructure model is that it can be incorporated into a numerical model that operates at the continuum level, and through the material constitutive behavior provide information at a microscopic level (microstructure).  
The strength of this physically-based microstructure model is that it can be incorporated into a numerical model that operates at the continuum level, and through the material constitutive behavior provide information at a microscopic level (microstructure).  
It was formulated to be applied to processes that incur severe plastic deformation, and makes assumptions based on this. The dislocation cell size is assumed to be the same size as the subgrains. It also assumes that these dislocation cells or subgrains will ultimately replace the larger grains. This assumption is adequate in processes where there is large grain refinement.
It was formulated to be applied to processes that incur severe plastic deformation, and makes assumptions based on this. The dislocation cell size is assumed to be the same size as the subgrains. It also assumes that these dislocation cells or subgrains will ultimately replace the larger grains. This assumption is adequate in processes where there is large grain refinement.


== Hardening Law Properties ==
== Hardening Law Properties ==
Line 73: Line 75:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
! Property !! Description  
! Property !! Description !! Units !! Default
|-
|-
| tayM ||  Taylor Factor
| tayM ||  Taylor Factor, <math>M</math> || none || 3.2
|-
|-
| rhoW || Initial dislocation density in cell wall, &rho;<sub>w</sub>
| rhoW || Initial dislocation density in cell wall, <math>\rho_w</math> || [[ConsistentUnits Command#Legacy and Consistent Units|1/length<sup>2</sup> units]] || 1e13
|-
|-
| rhoC || Initial dislocation density in cell interior, &rho;<sub>t</sub>
| rhoC || Initial dislocation density in cell interior, <math>\rho_c</math> || [[ConsistentUnits Command#Legacy and Consistent Units|1/length<sup>2</sup> units]] || 1e14
|-
|-
| fo || Initial volume fraction, f<sub>o</sub>. Unitless.
| fo || Initial volume fraction, <math>f_o</math> || none || 0.25
|-
|-
| flim || Saturation value of f at large strain, f<sub>lim</sub>. Unitless.
| flim || Saturation value of f at large strain, <math>f_{\infty}</math> || none || 0.06
|-
|-
| fsto || The rate of variation of f, with resolved shear strain rate.
| fsto || The rate of variation of f, with resolved shear strain rate, <math>\tilde{\gamma}^{r}</math> || [[ConsistentUnits Command#Legacy and Consistent Units|1/time units]] || 3.2
|-
|-
| sto || Reference strain rate.
| sto || Reference shear strain rate, <math>\dot{\gamma}_0</math> || [[ConsistentUnits Command#Legacy and Consistent Units|1/time units]] || 1e6
|-
|-
| m || Strain rate sensitivity exponent.
| m || Strain rate sensitivity exponent, <math>m</math> || none || 50
|-
|-
| n || Strain rate sensitivity exponent.
| n || Strain rate sensitivity exponent, <math>n</math> || none || 10
|-
|-
| alp || material constant, &alpha;.
| alp || material constant, <math>\alpha</math>  || none || 0.25
|-
|-
| burg || Burgers Vector, b.
| burg || Burgers Vector, <math>b</math> || [[ConsistentUnits Command#Legacy and Consistent Units|length units]] || 2.56e-10
|-
|-
| K1 || Proportionality constant between total dislocation density and grain size, K.
| K1 || Proportionality constant between total dislocation density and grain size, <math>K</math> || none || 10
|-
|-
| alpstar || Material constant, &alpha;*.
| alpstar || Material constant, <math>\alpha *</math> || none || 0.120
|-
|-
| betastar || Material constant, &beta;*.
| betastar || Material constant, <math>\beta *</math> || none || 0.006
|-
|-
| Atd || Temperature proportionality constant for m. Units K.
| Atd || Temperature proportionality constant for m, <math>A</math> || K || 30000
|-
|-
| Btd || Temperature proportionality constant for n. Units K.
| Btd || Temperature proportionality constant for n, <math>B</math> || K || 14900
|-
|-
| tempDepend || Turn temperature dependence of m and n on or off. 0 is off, 1 is on. If 1, must have conduction on for effect. * see note below table
| tempDepend || Turn temperature dependence of m and n on or off. 0 is off, 1 is on. If 1, must have conduction on for effect. * see note below table     || none || 0
|-
|-
| MMG || Shear Modulus. Enter in units of MPa.  
| MMG || Shear Modulus, <math>G</math>  || [[ConsistentUnits Command#Legacy and Consistent Units|pressure units]] || 48.93e3
|}
|}


Line 124: Line 126:
where d&epsilon;<sub>p</sub> is the incremental plastic strain tensor in one time step.  
where d&epsilon;<sub>p</sub> is the incremental plastic strain tensor in one time step.  


The current yield stress (&sigma;<sub>y</sub>) in MPa, and the current plastic strain rate (d&alpha;/dt in 1/sec). These variables are stored as history variables #1, #2, and #3.
The current yield stress (&sigma;<sub>y</sub>) in [[ConsistentUnits Command#Legacy and Consistent Units|pressure units]], and the current plastic strain rate (d&alpha;/dt in [[ConsistentUnits Command#Legacy and Consistent Units|1/time units]] ). These variables are stored as history variables #1, #2, and #3.


The #4 history variable is the average grain size (d) in metres.  
The #4 history variable is the average grain size (d) in metres.  


The #5 and #6 history variables are the dislocation densities in the cell interior and wall respectively.  
The #5 and #6 history variables are the dislocation densities in the cell interior and wall respectively.  


== References ==  
== References ==  


<references/>
<references/>

Latest revision as of 16:20, 2 June 2015

A dislocation density based polycrystal plasticity model hardening law (see Estrin et al.[1] and Toth et al.[2]).

The model allows for the tracking of dislocation density and provides a response variable that describes the grain size (or dislocation cell size) based on the variation in dislocation density. It considers the cell or grain to be made of two phases; a cell wall and cell interior, each with its own dislocation density. These two distinct dislocation densities are the internal variables of the model. The total dislocation density is made up of these two variables added together via a rule of mixtures:

      [math]\displaystyle{ \rho_{t} = f\rho_{w} + (1-f)\rho_{c} }[/math]

Where ρt is the total dislocation density, [math]\displaystyle{ f }[/math] is the volume fraction of the cell walls, ρc and ρw are the dislocation densities in the cell interior and cell walls respectively.

The grain or cell size is determined as proportional to the inverse of the square root of the total dislocation density:

      [math]\displaystyle{ d = \frac{K}{\sqrt{\rho_{t}}} }[/math]

Where d is the average cell size and K is a proportionality constant. The relation for volume fraction of the dislocation density in the cell walls, [math]\displaystyle{ f }[/math], is associated with the resolved shear strain rate, [math]\displaystyle{ \gamma^r }[/math], and the saturation value of [math]\displaystyle{ f }[/math] at large strains and initial volume fraction, [math]\displaystyle{ f_{\infty} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ f_o }[/math] respectively, which are constants. [math]\displaystyle{ \tilde\gamma^{r} }[/math], is the rate of variation of [math]\displaystyle{ f }[/math] with resolved shear strain rate, [math]\displaystyle{ \gamma^r }[/math].

      [math]\displaystyle{ f = f_{\infty} + (f_{o} - f_{\infty}) e^{\frac{-\gamma^{r}}{\tilde{\gamma}^{r}}} }[/math]

For the kinetic equations, the resolved shear stress is related to the resolved plastic shear strain rate. The two different dislocation densities give rise to two scalar stresses in the cell wall and cell interiors.

      [math]\displaystyle{ \tau^{r}_{c} = \alpha G b \sqrt{\rho_{c}}\bigg(\frac{\dot{\gamma^{r}_{c}}}{\dot{\gamma_{0}}}\bigg ) ^\frac{1}{m} }[/math]

      [math]\displaystyle{ \tau^{r}_{w} = \alpha G b \sqrt{\rho_{w}}\bigg(\frac{\dot{\gamma^{r}_{w}}}{\dot{\gamma_{0}}}\bigg ) ^\frac{1}{m} }[/math]

Where α is a constant, G is the shear modulus, b is the Burgers vector (a constant dependent on the crystal structure of the metal, i.e. fcc, hpc, bcc), [math]\displaystyle{ \dot{\gamma}_0 }[/math] is a reference shear strain rate, [math]\displaystyle{ \dot{\gamma}^r_c }[/math] is the shear strain rate of the cell interior, [math]\displaystyle{ \dot{\gamma^{r}_{w}} }[/math] is the shear strain rate of the cell wall, [math]\displaystyle{ 1\over m }[/math] is the strain rate sensitivity parameter, where m is inversely proportional to the absolute temperature:

      [math]\displaystyle{ m = \frac{A}{T} }[/math]

Where A is a constant. The overall behavior of the composite structure, described with two dislocation densities, is defined by the scalar quantity obtained using the rule of mixtures below.

      [math]\displaystyle{ \tau^{r} = f \tau^{r}_{w} + (1-f) \tau^{r}_{c} }[/math]

Where [math]\displaystyle{ \tau^{r} }[/math] is the resolved shear stress in the material. The yield stress, [math]\displaystyle{ \sigma_y }[/math] is proportional to this term via the Taylor Factor, M.

      [math]\displaystyle{ \sigma_y = M \tau^{r} }[/math]

The evolution equations for the dislocation density in the cell interior and cell wall are given below. Their evolution rate is a function of addition, subtraction and annihilation of dislocations. The growth of both can be attributed to Frank-Read sources at the cell wall or interior interface. The loss of cell interior dislocations can also be attributed to the movement from cell interior into the cell wall. The annihilation of cell dislocations is governed by cross-slip, whereby positive and negative dislocations, or “out of phase” dislocations cancel each other out, this is the last term in each equation.

      [math]\displaystyle{ \dot{\rho}_{c} = \alpha^{\ast}\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\frac{\sqrt{\rho_{w}}}{b}\dot{\gamma_{w}} - \beta^{\ast}\frac{6 \dot{\gamma_{c}}}{b d (1-f) ^\frac{1}{3}} - k_{o} \bigg ( \frac{\dot{\gamma_{c}}}{\dot{\gamma_{0}}} \bigg ) ^{- \frac{1}{n}} \dot{\gamma_{c}} \rho_{c} }[/math]

      [math]\displaystyle{ \dot{\rho}_{w} = \frac{6 \beta^{\ast} \dot{\gamma}_{c} (1-f)^{\frac{2}{3}}}{bdf} + \frac{\sqrt{3}\beta^{\ast} \dot{\gamma}_{c} (1-f) \sqrt{\rho_{w}}}{fb} - k_{o} \bigg ( \frac{\dot{\gamma_{w}}}{\dot{\gamma_{0}}} \bigg ) ^{- \frac{1}{n}} \dot{\gamma_{w}} \rho_{w} }[/math]


Where β*,α*,ko are constants, and similar to m, n is the strain rate sensitivity parameter, where n is inversely proportional to the absolute temperature:

      [math]\displaystyle{ n = \frac{B}{T} }[/math]

As the interface between the cell interior and cell wall must satisfy strain compatibility, the resolved shear strain rate is equal within each phase of the composite structure.

      [math]\displaystyle{ \dot{\gamma}^{r}_{c} = \dot{\gamma}^{r}_{w} = \dot{\gamma}^{r} }[/math]

The strength of this physically-based microstructure model is that it can be incorporated into a numerical model that operates at the continuum level, and through the material constitutive behavior provide information at a microscopic level (microstructure). It was formulated to be applied to processes that incur severe plastic deformation, and makes assumptions based on this. The dislocation cell size is assumed to be the same size as the subgrains. It also assumes that these dislocation cells or subgrains will ultimately replace the larger grains. This assumption is adequate in processes where there is large grain refinement.

Hardening Law Properties

This hardening law can set the following properties:

Property Description Units Default
tayM Taylor Factor, [math]\displaystyle{ M }[/math] none 3.2
rhoW Initial dislocation density in cell wall, [math]\displaystyle{ \rho_w }[/math] 1/length2 units 1e13
rhoC Initial dislocation density in cell interior, [math]\displaystyle{ \rho_c }[/math] 1/length2 units 1e14
fo Initial volume fraction, [math]\displaystyle{ f_o }[/math] none 0.25
flim Saturation value of f at large strain, [math]\displaystyle{ f_{\infty} }[/math] none 0.06
fsto The rate of variation of f, with resolved shear strain rate, [math]\displaystyle{ \tilde{\gamma}^{r} }[/math] 1/time units 3.2
sto Reference shear strain rate, [math]\displaystyle{ \dot{\gamma}_0 }[/math] 1/time units 1e6
m Strain rate sensitivity exponent, [math]\displaystyle{ m }[/math] none 50
n Strain rate sensitivity exponent, [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math] none 10
alp material constant, [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math] none 0.25
burg Burgers Vector, [math]\displaystyle{ b }[/math] length units 2.56e-10
K1 Proportionality constant between total dislocation density and grain size, [math]\displaystyle{ K }[/math] none 10
alpstar Material constant, [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha * }[/math] none 0.120
betastar Material constant, [math]\displaystyle{ \beta * }[/math] none 0.006
Atd Temperature proportionality constant for m, [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] K 30000
Btd Temperature proportionality constant for n, [math]\displaystyle{ B }[/math] K 14900
tempDepend Turn temperature dependence of m and n on or off. 0 is off, 1 is on. If 1, must have conduction on for effect. * see note below table none 0
MMG Shear Modulus, [math]\displaystyle{ G }[/math] pressure units 48.93e3
  • If using temperature dependence, temperature must be absolute set in Kelvin. The reference temperature, T0, is set using the simulations stress free temperature and not set using hardening law properties.
  • Default material parameters are for copper, see Lemiale et al[3].

History Data

This hardening law defines six history variables, which are the cumulative equivalent plastic strain (absolute) defined as:

      [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha = \sum \sqrt{2\over3}\ ||d\varepsilon_p|| }[/math]

where dεp is the incremental plastic strain tensor in one time step.

The current yield stress (σy) in pressure units, and the current plastic strain rate (dα/dt in 1/time units ). These variables are stored as history variables #1, #2, and #3.

The #4 history variable is the average grain size (d) in metres.

The #5 and #6 history variables are the dislocation densities in the cell interior and wall respectively.

References

  1. Estrin et al., "A dislocation-based model for all hardening stages in large strain deformation," Acta mater., 46, 5509-5522 (1998)
  2. Toth et al., "Strain hardening at large strains as predicted by dislocation based polycrystal plasticity model," J. Eng. Mat. and Techn., 124, 71-77 (2002)
  3. Lemiale et. al., "Grain refinement under high strain rate impact: A numerical approach," Comp. Mater. Sci., 48, 124-132 (2010)