Difference between revisions of "Exponential Traction Law"

From OSUPDOCS
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 82: Line 82:
<references>
<references>
<ref name="mmzone">J. A. Nairn and Y. E. Aimene "A re-evaluation of mixed-mode cohesive zone modeling based on strength concepts instead of traction laws" <i>in preparation</i> (2020).</ref>
<ref name="mmzone">J. A. Nairn and Y. E. Aimene "A re-evaluation of mixed-mode cohesive zone modeling based on strength concepts instead of traction laws" <i>in preparation</i> (2020).</ref>
<ref name="czm">J. A. Nairn, "Analytical and Numerical Modeling of R Curves for Cracks with Bridging Zones" <i>Int. J. Fracture</i>, <b>155</b>, 167-181 (2009). ([http://www.cof.orst.edu/cof/wse/faculty/Nairn/papers/JBridging.pdf See PDF])</ref>
</references>
</references>

Revision as of 16:27, 23 December 2020

The Traction Law

(Currently only in OSParticulas but common soon to NairnMPM).

Exptraction.jpg

This traction law assumes a linear elastic response up to σc followed by a scaled exponential decrease to reach zero at critical crack opening displacement (COD) of δc. The exponential decay in the post peak region (i.e., δ>δe) is given by

      [math]\displaystyle{ S(\delta) = \sigma_c\frac{e^{-\alpha\frac{\delta-\delta_e}{\delta_c-\delta_e}}-e^{-\alpha}}{1-e^{-\alpha}} }[/math]

This cohesive law defines traction as a function of crack opening displacement (COD) during uniaxial, monotonic loading. There are separate and uncoupled cohesive laws for opening displacement (mode I) and sliding displacement (mode II).

Notice how the shape changes with α. In the limit of α=0, this law is identical to the Triangular Traction Law (and that one should be used instead because it is more efficient). Increasing α causes traction to drop faster, which might simulate increasingly brittle response. The toughness of this cohesive law is the area under the curve that can be cast as

      [math]\displaystyle{ J_c = {1\over 2} \sigma_c\delta_c\left(\delta_{peak} + \bigl(1-\delta_{peak}\bigr)f(\alpha)\right) \quad{\rm where}\quad f(\alpha) = 2\left(\frac{1}{\alpha}-\frac{e^{-\alpha}}{1-e^{-\alpha}}\right) }[/math]

The function f(α) is 1 when α=0 and decays to zero as α increases. The toughness is thus bracketed by

      [math]\displaystyle{ {1\over 2} \sigma_c\delta_e \le J_c \le {1\over 2} \sigma_c\delta_c }[/math]

The minimum corresponds to large α with an instant drop to zero traction at δe while the maximum corresponds to α=0 and is area under the corresponding Triangular Traction Law.

When creating this traction law, you have to enter α, exactly two of σc, δp, and k and either Jc or δc. These four required properties must be entered for both mode I and mode II. If you enter δc, then the missing one of σc, δp, and k is calculated from one of

      [math]\displaystyle{ k = {\sigma_c\over \delta_{peak}\delta_c} \qquad {\rm or} \qquad \delta_{peak} = {\sigma_c\over k\delta_c} \qquad {\rm or} \qquad \sigma_c = k \delta_{peak}\delta_c }[/math]

Finally Jc is found from the expression above. If instead you enter Jc, the calculation of δc depends on which two of σc, δp, and k are provided:

      [math]\displaystyle{ {\rm from\ }\sigma_c\ {\rm and}\ \delta_{peak}:\quad \delta_c = \frac{2J_c}{\sigma_c\left(\delta_{peak} + \bigl(1-\delta_{peak}\bigr)f(\alpha)\right)} }[/math]

      [math]\displaystyle{ {\rm from\ }\sigma_c\ {\rm and}\ k:\quad \delta_c = \frac{2kJ_c-\bigl(1-f(\alpha)\bigr)\sigma_c^2}{k\sigma_cf(\alpha)} }[/math]

      [math]\displaystyle{ {\rm from\ }\delta_{peak}\ {\rm and}\ k:\quad \delta_c = \sqrt{\frac{2J_c}{k\delta_{peak}\left(\delta_{peak} + \bigl(1-\delta_{peak}\bigr)f(\alpha)\right)}} }[/math]

Once δc is found, the remaining property among σc, δp, and k is found using an expression above.

Comparison to Triangular Traction

While some a swayed that the use of exponential laws is some how much more realistic the linear laws, the details of cohesive law shape are of second-order importance. They have some minor effects (such as change in predicted R curve shapes), but in general, any two laws with the same toughness (area) and peak (strength), will have very similar results.

The only different between this exponential law and the Triangular Traction Law is the α parameter. As shown in the figure above, this parameter changes the decay region of the cohesive law. If one does a series of simulations keeping Jc and σc, but changing α (as a consequence, δc will increase as α increases), the results will have only minor differences. Because Triangular Traction Law is more efficient, it is usually the preferred cohesive law for simulations. This exponential law is provided for comparison to others or if the minor difference are important.

Failure

This laws uses uncoupled mode I and mode II cohesive laws. The failure is handled by the same methods used for the Triangular Traction Law. This exponential cohesive law can also be used for mode I or mode II laws in coupled mixed-mode modeling[1] by using the Mixed Mode Traction Law.

Traction Law Properties

The following properties are used to create a triangular traction law:

Property Description Units Default
alphaI Mode I α coefficient Dimensionless none
alphaII Mode II α coefficient Dimensionless none
(other) All other traction law properties varies varies

The resulting laws are required to have alphaI and alphaII greater than zero.

References

  1. J. A. Nairn and Y. E. Aimene "A re-evaluation of mixed-mode cohesive zone modeling based on strength concepts instead of traction laws" in preparation (2020).

Cite error: <ref> tag with name "czm" defined in <references> is not used in prior text.