Difference between revisions of "Coupled Traction Law"

From OSUPDOCS
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 48: Line 48:
<math>\frac{\delta_e^{(n)}}{\delta_c^{(n)}} = \frac{\delta_e^{(t)}}{\delta_c^{(t)}}</math>
<math>\frac{\delta_e^{(n)}}{\delta_c^{(n)}} = \frac{\delta_e^{(t)}}{\delta_c^{(t)}}</math>


In other words, the ratio of displacement at peak stress to displacment and failure must be the same for both normal and tangential directions. When use the exponential extension of the Högberg model the &alpha; coefficent must also be the same for normal and tangential directions.
In other words, the ratio of displacement at peak stress to displacment and failure must be the same for both normal and tangential directions. When using the exponential extension of the Högberg model the &alpha; coefficient must also be the same for normal and tangential directions.


Note that this implementation lets you choose properties that make the modeling invalid. That option is allowed for comparison of the published model to other models. If you do select invalid properties, the output file will include a warning. The preferred model for simulations of mixed-mode failure is the [[Mixed Mode Traction Law]].
Note that this implementation lets you [[#Traction Law Properties|choose properties]] that make the modeling invalid. That option is allowed for comparison of the published model to other models. If you do select invalid properties, the output file will include a warning. The preferred model for simulations of mixed-mode failure, which remains valid for independent normal and tangential laws, is the [[Mixed Mode Traction Law]].


== Alternate Effective Displacement Method ==
== Alternate Effective Displacement Method ==


See <ref name="comanho"/> and <ref name="comacho"/>
Other mixed-mode cohesive laws have used unscaled ''effective'' displacement models or simple define it is magnitude of the crack opening displacement:
 
 
 
except that COD and traction are now effective terms that are related to normal and tangential components of traction and displacement:
 
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<math> {\rm Traction} = T_{eff} \qquad{\rm where} \qquad T_{eff} = \sqrt{T_n^2+T_t^2}</math>
 
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<math> {\rm cod} = \delta_{eff} \qquad{\rm where} \qquad \delta_{eff} = \sqrt{\delta_n^2+\delta_t^2}</math>
 
where T<sub>n</sub> and T<sub>t</sub> are the normal and tangential tractions and &delta;<sub>n</sub> and &delta;<sub>t</sub> are the normal and tangential CODs.
 
This law can be expressed using damage mechanics by defining an effective slope of


&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<math>k_{eff}=(1-D)k</math>
<math>\lambda = \sqrt{\u_n^2+\u_t^2}</math>


where k is the initial slope of the curve and D is a damage parameter. This effective slope describes a line from the origin to the point on the triangular curve corresponding to the maximum displacement seen on the current particle. The effective traction along that line is
Examples are found in Comanho and Dàvila <ref name="comanho"/> and Comacho and Ortiz <ref name="comacho"/> (these models are implement in Abaqus cohesive elements. These models are note implemented in [[NairnMPM]] (or in [[OSParticulas]]) because they are superfluous. Then can be used simply by choosing


&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<math>T_{eff}=k_{eff}\delta_{eff}</math>
<math>\delta_c^{(n)} = \delta_c^{(t)}</math>


The effective stiffness is found using
Combining this restriction with the [[#Property Limitations|Högerg limitations]], means this alternate effective displacement model is invalid unless:


&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<math>(1-D)={\delta_{pk}(\delta_c-\delta_{max})\over\delta_{max}(\delta_c-\delta_{pk})}</math>
<math>\frac{\delta_e^{(n)}}{\delta_e^{(t)}} = \frac{\delta_c^{(n)}}{\delta_c^{(t)}} = 1</math>


where <code>&delta;<sub>c</sub></code> is the critical effective cod and <code>&delta;<sub>max</sub></code> is the maximum effective cod seen on the crack particle, except that it is initialized to the peak cod (&delta;<sub>pk</sub>) at the start of the calculations. By this relation, D = 0 until the effective cod passes the peak cod. Thereafter, D increases from 0 at the peak to 1 at the critical cod. Once D is found, the normal and tangential tractions are:
or critical displacements in the normal and tangential cohesive laws are identical (their magnitudes, or normal and tangential strengths, can differ).


&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
== Traction Law Properties ==
<math>T_n = k_{eff}\delta_n \qquad {\rm and} \qquad T_t = k_{eff}\delta_t </math>


Together, these traction satisfy the effective traction - effective cod law given above. Note that during monotonic loading the traction will remain on the curve. If unloading occurs, however, the tractions follow a line back to the original from the maximum cod.
The following properties are used to create a coupled traction law:


== Traction Law Properties ==
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Property !! Description !! Units !! Default
|-
| ([[Triangular Traction Law#Traction Law Properties|Sawtooth Laws]]) || Enter properties to define normal and tangential cohesive laws assuming triangular traction laws || varies || none
|-
| model || Choose whether to model using linear decay (12) or exponential decay (34). The numerical values are material IDs for linear and exponential [[Traction Laws|traction laws]] || none || 12
|-
| alpha || When using exponential decay (model=34), this parameter selects the &alpha; coefficient for the decay rate. Note than when using exponential decay, this implementation first assumes law properties assuming triangluar traction laws and then adjusts &delta;<sub>c</sub> such that toughness G<sub>c</sub> (or area under the traction law) of the exponential law matches the input properties for triangular laws. || none || none
|}


The properties you enter are the same as defined in
As [[Property Limitations|described above]], this implementation lets tyou select properties that invalidate the models when used to mode mixed-mode failure. If you choose invalid properties, a warning is printed in the outpout files.


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 12:04, 29 December 2020

The Traction Law

(This documentation is implementation of this law OSParticulas that is coming soon to NairnMPM. The current implementation in NairnMPM is different and should not be used until updated to this new implementation).

Exptraction.jpg

This traction law uses either the triangular cohesive law or the exponential cohesive law but couples the normal and tangential displacements by using an effective displacement. This implementation follows methods derived in a paper by Högberg [1]. The Högberg effective displacement is defined by

      [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda = \sqrt{\left(\frac{u_n}{\delta_c^{(n)}}\right)^2 +\left(\frac{u_t}{\delta_c^{(t)}}\right)^2} }[/math]

where u is displacement, δc is displacement at failure (see figure), and "n" and "t" refer to normal an tangential directions. In terms of λ, the normal an tangential tractions are:

      [math]\displaystyle{ \left(T^{(n)},T^{(t)}\right) = \frac{H(\lambda_\omega)}{\lambda_\omega} \left(\frac{\sigma_{c}^{(n)} u_n}{\delta_c^{(n)}},\frac{\sigma_{c}^{(t)} u_t}{\delta_c^{(t)}}\right) }[/math]

where λ\omega; is a damage parameter equal to the maximum value of λ during a simulation. These traction apply after initiation that occurs when λ reaches λp(θ) defined by

      [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{1}{ \lambda_p(\theta)} = \sqrt{\left(\frac{\delta_c^{(n)}\sin\theta}{\delta_e^{(n)}}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{\delta_c^{(t)}\cos\theta}{\delta_e^{(t)}}\right)^2} \quad {\rm with} \quad \theta = \frac{\delta_c^{(t)}u_n}{\delta_c^{(n)}u_t} }[/math]

and δe is displacement at end of the elastic regime. Finally, Högberg assumed H(λ) is defined by linear decay from 1 when λ=λp(θ) to zero when λ=1:

      [math]\displaystyle{ H(\lambda) = \frac{1-\lambda}{1-\lambda_p(\theta)} }[/math]

This implementation has extended the Höberg approach to also allow an exponential decay using:

      [math]\displaystyle{ H(\lambda) = \frac{e^{-\alpha\frac{\lambda-\lambda_p(\theta)}{1-\lambda_p(\theta)}}-e^{-\alpha}}{1-e^{-\alpha}} }[/math]

See figure above for effect of α on the decay rate (note that α=0 is identical to linear decay).

Failure

Under pure mode I or pure mode II, a coupled traction law and its failure are identical to a triangular cohesive law or an exponential cohesive law. Under mixed-mode conditions, however, these laws differ. Triangular and exponential cohesive law have to impose a mixed-mode failure criterion. This model does not need such a criterion. It fails naturally when λ reaches one. Despite this advantage of failing "naturally", the Högberg model [1] has limitations explained in the next section.

Property Limitations

The Höberg model [1] seemingly depends on independent normal and traction law properties that could be entered as for triangular or the exponential cohesive laws. In fact Ref. [1] claims independent properties are allowed. A new analysis of cohesive zone modeling [2] has revealed, however, that the Högberg model is always invalid for mixed mode loading unless properties are chosen such that

      [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{\delta_e^{(n)}}{\delta_c^{(n)}} = \frac{\delta_e^{(t)}}{\delta_c^{(t)}} }[/math]

In other words, the ratio of displacement at peak stress to displacment and failure must be the same for both normal and tangential directions. When using the exponential extension of the Högberg model the α coefficient must also be the same for normal and tangential directions.

Note that this implementation lets you choose properties that make the modeling invalid. That option is allowed for comparison of the published model to other models. If you do select invalid properties, the output file will include a warning. The preferred model for simulations of mixed-mode failure, which remains valid for independent normal and tangential laws, is the Mixed Mode Traction Law.

Alternate Effective Displacement Method

Other mixed-mode cohesive laws have used unscaled effective displacement models or simple define it is magnitude of the crack opening displacement:

      [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda = \sqrt{\u_n^2+\u_t^2} }[/math]

Examples are found in Comanho and Dàvila [3] and Comacho and Ortiz [4] (these models are implement in Abaqus cohesive elements. These models are note implemented in NairnMPM (or in OSParticulas) because they are superfluous. Then can be used simply by choosing

      [math]\displaystyle{ \delta_c^{(n)} = \delta_c^{(t)} }[/math]

Combining this restriction with the Högerg limitations, means this alternate effective displacement model is invalid unless:

      [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{\delta_e^{(n)}}{\delta_e^{(t)}} = \frac{\delta_c^{(n)}}{\delta_c^{(t)}} = 1 }[/math]

or critical displacements in the normal and tangential cohesive laws are identical (their magnitudes, or normal and tangential strengths, can differ).

Traction Law Properties

The following properties are used to create a coupled traction law:

Property Description Units Default
(Sawtooth Laws) Enter properties to define normal and tangential cohesive laws assuming triangular traction laws varies none
model Choose whether to model using linear decay (12) or exponential decay (34). The numerical values are material IDs for linear and exponential traction laws none 12
alpha When using exponential decay (model=34), this parameter selects the α coefficient for the decay rate. Note than when using exponential decay, this implementation first assumes law properties assuming triangluar traction laws and then adjusts δc such that toughness Gc (or area under the traction law) of the exponential law matches the input properties for triangular laws. none none

As described above, this implementation lets tyou select properties that invalidate the models when used to mode mixed-mode failure. If you choose invalid properties, a warning is printed in the outpout files.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 J. L. H ögberg, "Mixed mode cohesive law," International Journal of Fracture, 141, 549–559 (2006).
  2. J. A. Nairn and Y. E. Aimene "A re-evaluation of mixed-mode cohesive zone modeling based on strength concepts instead of traction laws" in preparation (2020).
  3. P. P. Camanho and C. G. Dàvila, "Mixed-mode decohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials," Technical Report, NASA/TM-2002-211737 (2002).
  4. G. T. Camacho and M. Ortiz, "Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials," Int. J. Solids Struct., 33, 2899–2938 (1996).