Difference between revisions of "XPIC Features"

From OSUPDOCS
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==


The PIC method can be described as applying a projection operator that modifies (and filters) particle velocities before updating them with the grid acceleration. The problem with PIC is that its projection operator filters many problems too heavily resulting in significant dissipation of energy. In contrast, XPIC defines a series of new projection operators that can significantly reduce the over damping of PIC simulations. XPIC is defined by an order <tt>m</tt>, where <tt>m=1</tt> is PIC, <tt>m&gt;1</tt> is XPIC, and large <tt>m</tt> approaches an ideal FLIP method with all null-space noise removed. In other words, <tt>m</tt> from 1 to infinity provides an interpolation between PIC and optimized FLIP, but is probably a better interpolation than the simple linear combination provided by [[#PIC Damping|standard PIC damping]].
The [[Damping Options#PIC Damping|PIC method]] can be described as applying a projection operator that modifies (and filters) particle velocities before updating them with the grid acceleration. The problem with PIC is that its projection operator filters most problems too heavily resulting in significant dissipation of energy. XPIC is a new methods to solved the energy dissipation problem, enhances overall stability of MPM, and reduces noise. XPIC(m) defines a series of new projection operators that can significantly reduce the over damping of PIC simulations. XPIC(m) is defined by an order <tt>m</tt>, where <tt>m=1</tt> is PIC, <tt>m&gt;1</tt> is XPIC, and large <tt>m</tt> approaches an ideal FLIP method with all null-space noise removed. In other words, <tt>m</tt> from 1 to infinity provides an interpolation between PIC and optimized FLIP, but is probably a better interpolation than the simple linear combination provided by [[#PIC Damping|standard PIC damping]].


The drawback of XPIC is that each higher order of XPIC requires two extra extrapolations. XPIC is therefore less efficient than PIC or FLIP (or a [[#PIC Damping|PIC damping]] linear combination of FLIP and PIC). In many problems, <tt>m=2</tt> already provides much improvement over PIC and reduces undesirable energy dissipation with minimal extra calculations. Larger <tt>m</tt> is often better with <tt>m=5</tt> appearing to provide much benefit without too much extra cost. Very high values of <tt>m</tt> (''e.g.'', <tt>m&gt;40</tt>) are typcially unstable (due to too many additional extrapolations).
The drawback of XPIC is that each higher order of XPIC requires two extra extrapolations. XPIC is therefore less efficient than PIC or FLIP (or a [[Damping Options#PIC Damping|PIC damping]] linear combination of FLIP and PIC). In many problems, <tt>m=2</tt> already provides much improvement over PIC and reduces undesirable energy dissipation with minimal extra calculations. Larger <tt>m</tt> is often better with <tt>m=5</tt> appearing to provide much benefit without too much extra cost. Very high values of <tt>m</tt> (''e.g.'', <tt>m&gt;40</tt>) are typcially unstable (due to too many additional extrapolations).


XPIC is activated by using the <tt>XPICOrder</tt> setting in combination with activating PIC by having &beta;&lt;1 in a <tt>Damping</tt> or a <tt>PDamping</tt> command.
XPIC is activated by using the <tt>XPICOrder</tt> setting in combination with activating PIC by having &beta;&lt;1 in a <tt>Damping</tt> or a <tt>PDamping</tt> command.
Note that XPIC can be used in combination with [[#PIC Damping|PIC damping]] where that method will now provide linear combination of fraction &beta; FLIP and (1-&beta;) of XPIC.
Note that XPIC can be used in combination with [[Damping Options#PIC Damping|PIC damping]] where that method will now provide linear combination of fraction &beta; FLIP and (1-&beta;) of XPIC.

Revision as of 19:27, 11 February 2018

XPIC is an improved form of PIC, which is only available in OSParticulas.[1]. The page explains how to use XPIC features.


Introduction

The PIC method can be described as applying a projection operator that modifies (and filters) particle velocities before updating them with the grid acceleration. The problem with PIC is that its projection operator filters most problems too heavily resulting in significant dissipation of energy. XPIC is a new methods to solved the energy dissipation problem, enhances overall stability of MPM, and reduces noise. XPIC(m) defines a series of new projection operators that can significantly reduce the over damping of PIC simulations. XPIC(m) is defined by an order m, where m=1 is PIC, m>1 is XPIC, and large m approaches an ideal FLIP method with all null-space noise removed. In other words, m from 1 to infinity provides an interpolation between PIC and optimized FLIP, but is probably a better interpolation than the simple linear combination provided by standard PIC damping.

The drawback of XPIC is that each higher order of XPIC requires two extra extrapolations. XPIC is therefore less efficient than PIC or FLIP (or a PIC damping linear combination of FLIP and PIC). In many problems, m=2 already provides much improvement over PIC and reduces undesirable energy dissipation with minimal extra calculations. Larger m is often better with m=5 appearing to provide much benefit without too much extra cost. Very high values of m (e.g., m>40) are typcially unstable (due to too many additional extrapolations).

XPIC is activated by using the XPICOrder setting in combination with activating PIC by having β<1 in a Damping or a PDamping command. Note that XPIC can be used in combination with PIC damping where that method will now provide linear combination of fraction β FLIP and (1-β) of XPIC.

  1. C. Hammerquist and J. A. Nairn, An Extended Particle in Cell Method (XPIC) for MPM", in preparation.