Difference between revisions of "Imperfect Interfaces"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Modeling interfaces, which are often finite-thickness interphases, in composite materials is difficult. In numerical modeling, it would seemingly be straight-forward to discretize interphase zones and thereby explicitly model all effects. This approach has two problems. First, interphase zones may be much smaller than the bulk materials. Resolving both bulk materials and a thin interphase would require a highly refined model, which may exceed computational capacity. Second, interphase properties may be unknown and/or may vary within a transition zone from one material to another. Alternative methods for interphase modeling are needed to overcome these challenges. This need is especially important in nanocomposites because the amount of interphase per unit volume of reinforcement greatly exceeds the amount of interphase in composites with mi cron or larger reinforcement phases. As a consequence, interphases are expected to play a larger role, good or bad, in nanocomposite properties. | Modeling interfaces, which are often finite-thickness interphases, in composite materials is difficult. In numerical modeling, it would seemingly be straight-forward to discretize interphase zones and thereby explicitly model all effects. This approach has two problems. First, interphase zones may be much smaller than the bulk materials. Resolving both bulk materials and a thin interphase would require a highly refined model, which may exceed computational capacity. Second, interphase properties may be unknown and/or may vary within a transition zone from one material to another. Alternative methods for interphase modeling are needed to overcome these challenges. This need is especially important in nanocomposites because the amount of interphase per unit volume of reinforcement greatly exceeds the amount of interphase in composites with mi cron or larger reinforcement phases. As a consequence, interphases are expected to play a larger role, good or bad, in nanocomposite properties. | ||
One way to model interphases is to abandon attempts for explicit modeling and instead replace 3D interphases with 2D interfaces<ref name="Hash90">Z. Hashin, "Thermoelastic properties of fiber composites with imperfect interface," ''Mech. of Materials'', '''8''', 333–348 (1990).</ref> The interphase effects are reduced to modeling the response of 2D interfaces due to tractions normal and tangential to the interfacial surface, which can be modeled by interface traction laws. Elimination of 3D interphases removes the resolution problem. The use of interface traction laws always replaces numerous unknown and potentially unmeasurable interphase properties with a much smaller number of interface parameters. If interface traction laws can be determined, one can potentially model interphase effects well. Example of using this for analytical modeling of interface effects in composite materials are in Hashin (1991)<ref name="Hash91a">Z. Hashin, "Composite materials with viscoelastic interphase: Creep and relaxation," ''Mech. of Materials'', '''11''', 135–148 (1991).</ref><ref name="Hash91b">Z. Hashin, "Thermoelastic properties of particulate composites with imperfect interface," ''Journalof the Mechanics and Physics of Solids'', '''39''', 745–762 (1991).</ref> and Nairn and Liu (1997)<ref name="Nair97">J. A. Nairn and Y. C. Liu, "Stress transfer into a fragmented, anisotropic fiber through an imperfect interface," ''Int. J. Solids Structures'', '''34''', 1255–1281 (1997).</ref> Implementation of imperfect interfaces in FEA is described in Nairn (2007).<ref name="Nairn04">J. A. Nairn, "Numerical implementation of imperfect interfaces," ''Computational Materials Science'', '''40''', 525–536 (2007).</ref> | One way to model interphases is to abandon attempts for explicit modeling and instead replace 3D interphases with 2D interfaces<ref name="Hash90">Z. Hashin, "Thermoelastic properties of fiber composites with imperfect interface," ''Mech. of Materials'', '''8''', 333–348 (1990).</ref> The interphase effects are reduced to modeling the response of 2D interfaces due to tractions normal and tangential to the interfacial surface, which can be modeled by interface traction laws. Elimination of 3D interphases removes the resolution problem. The use of interface traction laws always replaces numerous unknown and potentially unmeasurable interphase properties with a much smaller number of interface parameters. If interface traction laws can be determined, one can potentially model interphase effects well. Example of using this for analytical modeling of interface effects in composite materials are in Hashin (1991)<ref name="Hash91a">Z. Hashin, "Composite materials with viscoelastic interphase: Creep and relaxation," ''Mech. of Materials'', '''11''', 135–148 (1991).</ref><ref name="Hash91b">Z. Hashin, "Thermoelastic properties of particulate composites with imperfect interface," ''Journalof the Mechanics and Physics of Solids'', '''39''', 745–762 (1991).</ref> and Nairn and Liu (1997)<ref name="Nair97">J. A. Nairn and Y. C. Liu, "Stress transfer into a fragmented, anisotropic fiber through an imperfect interface," ''Int. J. Solids Structures'', '''34''', 1255–1281 (1997).</ref> Implementation of imperfect interfaces in FEA and in MPM is described in Nairn (2007).<ref name="Nairn04">J. A. Nairn, "Numerical implementation of imperfect interfaces," ''Computational Materials Science'', '''40''', 525–536 (2007).</ref> An alternative method for imperfect interfaces in MPM using multimaterial mode MPM is described in Nairn (2013).<ref name="Nair13"> | ||
J.A. Nairn, "Modeling Imperfect Interfaces in the Material Point Method using Multimaterial Methods," ''Computer Modeling in Eng. & Sci.'', '''92''', 271-299 (2013).</ref> | J.A. Nairn, "Modeling Imperfect Interfaces in the Material Point Method using Multimaterial Methods," ''Computer Modeling in Eng. & Sci.'', '''92''', 271-299 (2013).</ref> | ||
Revision as of 12:58, 14 September 2013
Both NairnMPM and NairnFEA can model imperfect interfaces between phases in composite structures.
Imperfect Interface Theory
Modeling interfaces, which are often finite-thickness interphases, in composite materials is difficult. In numerical modeling, it would seemingly be straight-forward to discretize interphase zones and thereby explicitly model all effects. This approach has two problems. First, interphase zones may be much smaller than the bulk materials. Resolving both bulk materials and a thin interphase would require a highly refined model, which may exceed computational capacity. Second, interphase properties may be unknown and/or may vary within a transition zone from one material to another. Alternative methods for interphase modeling are needed to overcome these challenges. This need is especially important in nanocomposites because the amount of interphase per unit volume of reinforcement greatly exceeds the amount of interphase in composites with mi cron or larger reinforcement phases. As a consequence, interphases are expected to play a larger role, good or bad, in nanocomposite properties.
One way to model interphases is to abandon attempts for explicit modeling and instead replace 3D interphases with 2D interfaces[1] The interphase effects are reduced to modeling the response of 2D interfaces due to tractions normal and tangential to the interfacial surface, which can be modeled by interface traction laws. Elimination of 3D interphases removes the resolution problem. The use of interface traction laws always replaces numerous unknown and potentially unmeasurable interphase properties with a much smaller number of interface parameters. If interface traction laws can be determined, one can potentially model interphase effects well. Example of using this for analytical modeling of interface effects in composite materials are in Hashin (1991)[2][3] and Nairn and Liu (1997)[4] Implementation of imperfect interfaces in FEA and in MPM is described in Nairn (2007).[5] An alternative method for imperfect interfaces in MPM using multimaterial mode MPM is described in Nairn (2013).[6]
Imperfect Interface Traction Laws
Imperfect Interface Options in MPM
Imperfect Interface Options in FEA
References
- ↑ Z. Hashin, "Thermoelastic properties of fiber composites with imperfect interface," Mech. of Materials, 8, 333–348 (1990).
- ↑ Z. Hashin, "Composite materials with viscoelastic interphase: Creep and relaxation," Mech. of Materials, 11, 135–148 (1991).
- ↑ Z. Hashin, "Thermoelastic properties of particulate composites with imperfect interface," Journalof the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 39, 745–762 (1991).
- ↑ J. A. Nairn and Y. C. Liu, "Stress transfer into a fragmented, anisotropic fiber through an imperfect interface," Int. J. Solids Structures, 34, 1255–1281 (1997).
- ↑ J. A. Nairn, "Numerical implementation of imperfect interfaces," Computational Materials Science, 40, 525–536 (2007).
- ↑ J.A. Nairn, "Modeling Imperfect Interfaces in the Material Point Method using Multimaterial Methods," Computer Modeling in Eng. & Sci., 92, 271-299 (2013).